twitterfacebooklinkedin

Organization Change: Learning from the Best

by AIMM MAITD

Managing change in today's organizations is not getting any easier. However, doing it well is the new imperative. How are organizations faring with moving their people and systems in new directions? IBM Global Business Services researched change management practices across the globe. Their extensive Making Change Work Study quizzed over 1,500 project leaders, sponsors, project managers and change managers from many of the world's leading organizations, ranging from small to very large in size.

The IBM survey was fairly representative, covering a wide range of small to large projects designed to implement strategic, organizational, operational and technology based change. Project objectives included improving customer satisfaction, sales and revenue growth, reducing costs, innovating processes, implementing technology and entering new markets.

The stand out feature of the IBM study is its solid reinforcement of the business imperative: for companies to survive and strive in today's competitive environment, they will need to change quickly and successfully. Managing change is now a core competence that can no longer be considered a discretionary "nice to have". Yet most organizations are falling short in the race to adapt. The accelerating pace of change coupled with increasing uncertainty and complexity has pushed up this skills gap to what is now a major area of concern.

The IBM study reveals that the percentage of CEOs expecting substantial change has risen from 65% in 2006 to 83% in 2008. However, CEOs reporting that they had managed change well in past projects climbed from 57% in 2006 to only 61% in 2008. This constitutes a more than tripling in the size of the gap between actual change capability and needed capability. The costs to organizations are real and sizeable. Failed change initiatives bring in their wake budget overruns, disgruntled customers and demoralized employees.

How successful are organizations at implementing change? The IBM study reports most CEOs considering themselves and their organizations largely ineffective at bringing about change. The change practitioners themselves reported the following change program success rates:

  • 41%  fully met objectives
  • 44%  missed at least one objective
  • 15%  missed all objectives or aborted

In all, 59% of change initiatives failed to meet their objectives. This is quite a sobering result as we set about entering the second decade of the 21st century. Another sobering thought is the stark contrast between those organizations getting change management right and those that are struggling. The top 20% of organizations, the study reveals, are successful 80% of the time. Conversely, the bottom 20% of organizations only manage to achieve their change objectives 8% of the time. The top 20% of companies are ten times more likely to lead a successful change initiative than the bottom 20%.

Clearly, underachieving organizations can draw important lessons from the top achievers. What are the barriers to successful change and what are the key success factors that poor performers can leverage to their competitive advantage? The IBM study provides valuable insights into what poorly performing organizations can do to emulate the success of their better performing competitors. What are these lessons?

Through their research study, IBM revealed these key barriers to successful change:

  • 58%  Changing mindsets and attitudes
  • 49%  Corporate culture
  • 35%  Complexity is underestimated
  • 33%  Shortage of resources
  • 32%  Lack of commitment of higher management
  • 20%  Lack of change know how
  • 18%  Lack of transparency because of missing or wrong information
  • 16%  Lack of motivation of involved employees
  • 15%  Change of process
  • 12%  Change of IT systems
  •   8%  Technology barriers

Note how people factors account for the top three challenges and for four out of the top five. Getting the "soft" stuff right turns out harder to do than getting the traditional "hard" stuff, such as resources and technology, correctly aligned. What was once considered the unimportant "soft and fuzzy" aspect of organizational life turns out to be what makes or breaks change projects. This picture of what enables successful change is highlighted again in IBM's uncovering of the key success factors. These key ingredients for successful change, as revealed by the top performers in the study, are:

  • 92%  Top management sponsorship
  • 72%  Employee involvement
  • 70%  Honest and timely communication
  • 65%  Corporate culture that motivates and promotes change
  • 55%  Change agents (pioneers of change)
  • 48%  Change supported by culture
  • 38%  Efficient training programs
  • 36%  Adjustment of performance measures
  • 33%  Efficient organization structure
  • 19%  Monetary and non-monetary incentives

Once again, tuning in to the "soft" factors makes up for the top six key aspects for successful change. How does your organization measure up on its change management scorecard?

Pull out a blank sheet of paper and place a line down the middle of the sheet, from top to bottom. On the left hand side of the sheet, enter all of the above key barriers. At the top of the sheet, label this list with "Forces Against Change". On the right hand side of the sheet, list the above key success factors and label the list "Forces For Change".

Now place a line under each factor pointing to your center line. Make the length of each line proportional to the strength of each force; either for or against the planned change. You have now an instant picture of the current health of your change program. Work with your team to develop strategies for leveraging the predominant forces for change and for mitigating the strongest forces against change.

Find out all you can about how to weaken the barriers against change and strengthen the key success factors. Respect and develop your own skills as a change leader and invest in the skill development of your change team. All the while, keep uppermost in your considerations the central learning from this IBM study: that people matter the most.

References:

Copyright © Leslie Allan

About the Author
Leslie Allan

Leslie Allan is Managing Director of Business Performance Pty Ltd; a management consulting firm specializing in people and process capability. He has been assisting organizations for over 20 years, contributing in various roles as project manager, consultant and trainer for organizations large and small.

He is also the author of five books on training and change management and is the creator of various training tools and templates. Leslie is a member of the Australian Institute of Management and the Quality Society of Australasia. He is also a member of the Divisional Council of the Victorian Division of the Australian Institute of Training and Development (AITD). Leslie may be contacted by email at office@businessperform.com

Leslie Recommends
Managing Change in the Workplace

Find out more about organizational change. Check out Leslie's resource kit, Managing Change in the Workplace. Its tools, exercises, techniques and tips cover every aspect of managing change. Visit the Managing Change in the Workplace information portal to find out how to download the free Introductory Chapter and start using this practical change management guide and workbook today.

Share This

  • twitter
  • facebook
  • linkedin
  • googleplus
  • gmail
  • delicious
  • reddit
  • digg
  • newsvine
  • posterous
  • friendfeed
  • googlebookmarks
  • yahoobookmarks
  • yahoobuzz
  • orkut
  • stumbleupon
  • diigo
  • mixx
  • technorati
  • netvibes
  • myspace
  • slashdot
  • blogger
  • tumblr
  • email
Short URL:http://bit.ly/w3uxNy

SUBSCRIBE NOW




Privacy